By John Joseph
Kindly share this news
The Court of Appeal’s recent decision to dismiss Philip Shaibu’s appeal against the PDP’s primary election in Edo State has sent shockwaves throughout the political landscape. The verdict, which upheld the high court’s earlier ruling, has significant implications for the upcoming governorship election in the state.
To understand the context of this decision, it is essential to delve into the events that led to the appeal. Philip Shaibu, the embattled Deputy Governor of Edo State, had challenged the outcome of the PDP’s primary election, which saw Asue Ighodalo emerge as the party’s candidate. Shaibu’s appeal was based on
claims that the primary election was not conducted in accordance with the party’s constitution and the Electoral Act.However, the Court of Appeal’s decision to dismiss Shaibu’s appeal has put an end to the controversy surrounding the primary election.
The court’s ruling was based on the grounds that Shaibu lacked the legal standing to challenge the outcome of the primary poll, as he did not participate in the election. This decision is in line with the principles of democracy, which emphasize the importance of participation and engagement in the electoral process.
The implications of this verdict are far-reaching. Firstly, it reinforces the importance of internal democracy within political parties. The PDP’s commitment to upholding its constitution and the Electoral Act has been vindicated, and this sets a precedent for future elections. Secondly, the verdict highlights the need for political actors to respect the rule of law and the decisions of the courts.
Shaibu’s failure to explore internal dispute resolution mechanisms within the PDP before approaching the court has been widely criticized, and this decision serves as a reminder of the importance of exhausting all avenues before seeking external intervention.
Furthermore, the Court of Appeal’s decision has significant implications for the upcoming governorship election in Edo State. With the PDP’s candidate, Asue Ighodalo, now confirmed, the party can focus on its campaign and preparations for the election. The verdict also serves as a boost to the party’s morale, as it reinforces the legitimacy of its internal processes.
In addition, the decision has been praised by political analysts and legal experts, who see it as a triumph of democracy and the rule of law. “This verdict is a victory for democracy and a testament to the independence of the judiciary,” said Professor Festus Emiri, a political scientist at the University of Benin.
“It shows that the courts are committed to upholding the principles of democracy and ensuring that the electoral process is free and fair.”In conclusion, the Court of Appeal’s decision on the Edo State PDP primary election has significant implications for the upcoming governorship election and the political landscape as a whole.
The verdict reinforces the importance of internal democracy, respect for the rule of law, and the need for political actors to exhaust all avenues before seeking external intervention. As Nigeria prepares for future elections, this decision serves as a reminder of the need for political parties and individuals to uphold the principles of democracy and respect the rule of law.